On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:03:55AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Mer 30 mai 2007 09:09, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:14:21PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >> > >> I call crap on that. I was a single systems person for a bunch of > >> systems for a long time. You keep your sanity by enforcing policy > >> and > >> you can do that by using the tools available to you to simplify the > >> tasks. You don't need homogeneous hw, you need LARGELY homogeneous > >> hw. > >> So you limit the processor archs and you try to focus things down as > >> much as possible. > > > > It isn't necessarily enough. Do you consider a mix of centos4 and > > fedora to be homogeneous? > > Once you have a largely homegeneous hw parc you can deploy homogenous > sw platform. But the systems may serve different purposes like number crunchers (stable and secure, long-lived and low maintenance components aka RHEL/CentOS/SL) vs desktops (bigger choice, fresher content aka Fedora). Is strongly assume this is Patrice's need for separation. > That's the main point of having homegeneous hw. If one > could sanely deploy the same sw platform on heterogeneous hw having > homogenous hw would not matter as much. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpGw3zQvwMPl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
