On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 20:20 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > And both of those have a fundamental issue that they're disconnect > with what > we need - the rpm *package* version; unless of course emacs/xemacs add > a versioned Provides or something like the httpd-mmn mechanism in the > httpd package that aligns better with what can be retrieved from > querying them or something non-rpm. Do you really need that fine grained of a version? Is emacs/xemacs that picky, that the API/ABI breaks on releases? That you have to match to the exact package? ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
