On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 00:26 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 27/05/07, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Regarding the current Emacsen add-on draft,
> >
> > * Added some more info about requiring a version of (X)Emacs newer than or
> > equal to the one used to compile the *.elcs, and how to find that version out
> > dynamically during package build.
> >
>
> Actually, I was just testing this, and it doesn't work.
>
> You added these macros:
> %define emacsversion v=$(rpm -q --qf=%%{VERSION} emacs) ; case $v in
> 2*) echo $v ;; *) echo 0 ;; esac
>
> %define xemacsversion v=$(rpm -q --qf=%%{VERSION} xemacs) ; case $v in
> 2*) echo $v ;; *) echo 0 ;; esac
Good lord. No. Thou shalt not query rpm inside rpm.
Ask emacs/xemacs what version it is.
~spot
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
