Re: paragraph on shipping static numerical libs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:10:22AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 10:15 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> 
> > I only advocate shipping static libraries, no statically linked packages
> > against those libraries. These libs are for use for locally compiled 
> > programs, not for packages shipped with fedora. So no maintainance
> > issue.
> > 
> 
> The obvious question is, if this is only for locally compiled programs,
> why not compile the necessary static libraries locally as well ? Why
> should we carry that burden ?

Because we care about users?

--
Pat

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux