On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:22:00PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote : > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:52:00PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > > > (this said, on a quite simple FC6 x86_64 install on which I've done > > > "yum remove glibc.i686" post-install, gnome-terminal crashes > > > in some /usr/lib64/gconv/ library, which I suspect has something to do > > > with multilib and rpm removing translations... but even after nearly > > > two hours, I still couldn't figure out where the problem lies... glibc, > > > some libgnome*... dunno...) > > > > Try rpm -Va 2>&1 | grep missing > > Done that, waaaaaaaayyyyy too many docs and translations gone. I forced > a reinstall of the packages I thought could be the cause (i.e. glibc*, > libgnome, gtk2/glib2 etc.) but without any apparent success. > > Anyway, my point was that from my POV multilib is ugly (I think we're > all aware of that and all agree...), In fact, I like multilib/multiarch. It isn't the general concept that sucks, but our overwrite concept and the buggy implementation in rpm. > and that I still don't like the fact that it's forced upon all users > by default (this is where opinions are much more mixed). > > Arch dependencies isn't something we would have to worry about if we > weren't doing all of this ugly mixing of archs on single systems ;-) > > Matthias -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpET8JjdsMcU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
