Re: Re: -devel arch dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:24 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> seth vidal wrote :
> 
> > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 09:06 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:52:00PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > > > Matthias, still annoyed at "yum install gdb" trying to pull in almost an
> > > > entire "compat" 32bit system... yeah, "yum install gdb.x86_64" :-p
> > > 
> > > Someday we'll convince Seth to come around on this. :)
> > 
> > And how do we go about explaining to users on x86_64 machines why they
> > have to jump through all these hoops to run firefox that'll work with
> > plugins?
> 
> s/plugins/proprietary plugins only available for 32bit x86/
> 
> ...and the answer could be : Shouldn't we care about as much as how to
> install proprietary video drivers or patent encumbered codecs? :-)

okie doke. I can understand that. If you don't want multilib pkgs
installed then that's do-able. But I'm not the person to convince of it
and I don't think it comes back to me to decide this for the
distribution.

-sv


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux