On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 15:33 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Just looking at what hasn't been requilt: Some packages like > bitstream-fonts really don't deserve a rebuild (they also don't > deserve a disttag FWIW), but others like bridge-utils that depend on > kernel-headers at build time possibly do, and now we're running with > bridge-utils built against 2.6.18. But see, just rebuilding bridge-utils isn't going to be enough to get any new kernel functionality[1]... you also going to want to get the new release of bridge-utils. And go through any bugs filed. Automated rebuilds tend to hide things like this, which actually lead to more problems down the line Jeremy [1] I don't know if there actually _is_ any in this case, but there is a new bridge-utils upstream release from a quick look at the website. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
