On Tuesday 10 April 2007 09:33:29 Axel Thimm wrote: > 1 100% > 2 99.7% > 3 100% > 4 96.6% > 5 99.991% > 6 95% > 7 80% > > So as you see, up to F7 Core had really been effectively rebuilt on > each release with FC4 and FC5 being the most "sloppy" ones leaving > 3.4% and 5% resp. not rebuilt. With F7 Core drops down to 80% rebuild > rate. This *is* a new release model. What I'm saying is that these numbers often happen naturally instead of forced by a full rebuild. _That_ is the model that hasn't changed. The ONLY time we've done a forced rebuild is for technical reasons and NOT for arbitrary reasons like "hrm, this is test2, maybe we should rebuild everything just for the hell of it" or "there is a lot of disttags that haven't been updated, lets do rebuilds to reset them, that sounds like a good idea...". Rebuilding for technical reasons is fine, relying upon throwaway rebuilds to find said technical reasons is strongly encouraged. Picking arbitrary points to forcefully rebuild everything is not. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpQRBonjzQNM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
