Re: Is this license okay for a fedora package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 02:28 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Steven Pritchard wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:45:01PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to be
> >> original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding extension
> >> added. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> http://www.maiamailguard.org/license.php
> > 
> > Isn't Maia a fork of amavisd-new?
> 
> Pretty much, yeah.
> 
> > If so, how can its license be anything other than than GPL?

I don't think amavisd-new had any web interface.
That part of the license may apply only to the web interface.

> Good question... I'll raise that with the authors.

Yes, and it would be nice if the author would release it under pure GPL,
or maybe the Affero GPL ?

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux