Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:13 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
I have added a draft for handling Post Release packages.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PostRelease
Comments are always welcomed.
~spot
I would appreciate it if you would argue the case
in which upstream uses the tarball like
<name>-<version>-<release>.tar.gz.
One case is ImageMagick, and the other case is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560
IMO, in such cases the upstream "version-release" should be treated as
rpm's "version"
'-' is not a valid character in an rpm version.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
