On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:13 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > I have added a draft for handling Post Release packages. > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PostRelease > > > > Comments are always welcomed. > > > > ~spot > > I would appreciate it if you would argue the case > in which upstream uses the tarball like > > <name>-<version>-<release>.tar.gz. > > One case is ImageMagick, and the other case is: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 IMO, in such cases the upstream "version-release" should be treated as rpm's "version" Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
