On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:59:32PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > You also need to writeup your reasons for having a static library in the > first place and presenting it to FESCo. The fact that Jeff Garzik wants I know this has allready been voted, but I still think that it is wrong, it is really a technical issue and not a political one as this thread once more shows. static libs are allready discouraged, I don't think it is relevant to ask fesco for inclusion of every lib, packagers should be responsible enough. > to use it is a two edged sword -- on the one hand it means there is a > need for the library. OTOH, it means that the library is going to be > used by multiple programs which is what leads to the security and other > problems. Is libsparse going to be involved in situations where security matters? I guess not? -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
