Re: static subpackages (was: sparse 0.2, headers and static lib)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:59:32PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:32 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > static subpackages have been discussed a bit in the recent past, but
> > not by the packaging group.

> Actually, I think we voted on this:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage
> 
> My memory is backed up by the status on:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GuidelinesTodo

Oops, sorry I must have missed that meeting and I'm spreading lies now
(I thought I had checked all available minutes when I couldn't make it
to a meeting).

But it only contains a proposal on the naming of the package, some
parts like the intradependencies of subpackages should also be part of
the guidelines. Maybe Ralf could extend this part?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpV8jFWRjYPn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux