Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 07:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >>>> See >>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives >>>> Comments? >>> It's a fault to remove *.la's. >> Thanks so much for the constructive input. > > What do you expect as an answer to somebody who has been and is > spreading FUD on libtool for a very long time, has a web page called > "libtool sucks" ... So, if I retitled the webpage "libtool rocks! (except when dealing with .la files in rpm packaging)" would that help? (Hmm... sounds good, I think I'll do that anyway) Regardless, there are *real* problems outlined and addressed in this proposal and said webpage. If I've made errors/omissions, please point them out, but jumping on a soapbox and yelling "FUD!" isn't helping anyone. -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
