Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 07:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> See
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives
> >> Comments?
> 
> > It's a fault to remove *.la's.
> 
> Thanks so much for the constructive input.

What do you expect as an answer to somebody who has been and is
spreading FUD on libtool for a very long time, has a web page called
"libtool sucks" and despite the fact he is agitating against libtool,
has NEVER EVER shown up on any libtool list, nor reported a bug?

If you have got something to say against libtool, report it upstream or
stop this foul propaganda.

Ralf


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux