Le vendredi 08 septembre 2006 à 16:09 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > So I think it's way too early to be > forcing people to test with SELinux on. It's a vicious circle - if you don't test next release won't work with selinux, which mean you won't test, and so on. I'd probably relax the rules as "all packages must be tested with SeLinux by FC7T1", with the selinux team making sure selinux does not change too much afterwards so : 1. tested packages keep working at least till FC9T1 2. FC7 is solid selinux-wise and from FC7 on we *can* require new packages to be selinux-proof Note that FC7T1 is an *optimistic* deadline, it requires the selinux team to stabilise code tools and documentation well before, *and* block the human resources that will be necessary to help other packagers at the test date, and fix packages before FC7 proper. If FC7 is half-fixed like the previous ones, it *will* quickly degenerate. (network effects) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
