>>>>> "GD" == Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: GD> Another big +1. The unfortunate side effect here is that it's GD> possible -- even likely -- that most community packagers won't GD> give two craps about the SELinux SIG. Well, don't underestimate your reviewers. I know enough to point out some packages which will likely have selinux issues even though I am not generally able to test them under selinux. What has been a problem (for instance, in the Bugzilla review) is that even given an SELinux policy to test, nobody involved could do the testing. I tried but I just ended up wasting a couple of hours on relabels and ending up with a machine that needed to be reinstalled. Fortunately I have plenty of machines around that I can hack on; many reviewers and packagers aren't so blessed. I note that the submitter/maintainer of the Extras Bugzilla package is @redhat.com. The review ticket is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
