On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:40:16PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:45:06PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > I'd be interested in seeing examples of cases where creating files in > > %post that are not owned by %files would be wanted. I can't think of > > any. > > With httpd we auto-generate a unique SSL certificate in %post > (/etc/pki/tls/localhost.crt et al; some other packages are similar > IIRC). I don't think it would be correct to have those generated files > %files-owned by the package in any way. I wouldn't consider certificates config files anyway. although one should think about ownership over them, too. What's wrong with %ghost %config(noreplace) them? Upgrades won't touch them. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpMU09Mui8Di.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
