On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:05:51PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:03 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Isn't this handled in some guidelines? If not shouldn't it? > > I thought we had a rule about creating files in %post or whatnot and not > owning them. I could be wrong, but I check for that when I review > packages. IMHO any file a package creates on the file system at install > time should be owned or ghosted by that package. The file is not created by %post. Currently it is created by anaconda, which is a remnant of old times (a safety measure of making sure rpm behaves multilib). The target would be for anaconda to not have to touch /etc/rpm/config at all leaving it completely to the user's discretion. But still that file is unowned. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpK5oq6idOoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
