On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:19:15 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 11:24 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>
> >1. Look on the fedora-packaging list for the discussion
> >2. my guess is:
> > a. if the fedora.us package had a non-zero epoch it needs to be
> >maintained - just so users have an upgrade path
> > b. if the fedora.us package had an Epoch: 0 drop it and remove
> >%{epoch} from anyplace you have it in ver strings.
>
> I agree with this. Anyone else have thoughts?
Dropping "Epoch: 0" breaks rpm -F updates. This is in bugzilla
somewhere.
