On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 11:24 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>1. Look on the fedora-packaging list for the discussion
>2. my guess is:
> a. if the fedora.us package had a non-zero epoch it needs to be
>maintained - just so users have an upgrade path
> b. if the fedora.us package had an Epoch: 0 drop it and remove
>%{epoch} from anyplace you have it in ver strings.
I agree with this. Anyone else have thoughts?
~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
