On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 18:20 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >Tom 'spot' Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 18:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >Tom 'spot' Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> >> If our buildroots don't have it, then thats a serious failure (its in >> >> System Environment/Base). >> > >> >Well, you'd still want it to get pulled in via a dep somehow. Right >> >now that would be via initscripts, which may or may not be in >> >the build dependency chain. >> >> So basically, its not safe to assume any of System Environment/Base is >> installed? >> >> Should all packages start having bash, coreutils, grep, etc, etc as >> BuildRequires: ? > >There should be a stock list on the wiki somewhere; you can assume >coreutils, gcc, make, etc., and whatever those pull in. Whether or >not that means they'd pull in initscripts, I don't know. coreutils requires pam, which requires initscripts. Kevin Bacon is in there somewhere too, but it means we don't need BuildRequires: redhat-release. ~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
