Tom 'spot' Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 18:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >Tom 'spot' Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> If our buildroots don't have it, then thats a serious failure (its in > >> System Environment/Base). > > > >Well, you'd still want it to get pulled in via a dep somehow. Right > >now that would be via initscripts, which may or may not be in > >the build dependency chain. > > So basically, its not safe to assume any of System Environment/Base is > installed? > > Should all packages start having bash, coreutils, grep, etc, etc as > BuildRequires: ? There should be a stock list on the wiki somewhere; you can assume coreutils, gcc, make, etc., and whatever those pull in. Whether or not that means they'd pull in initscripts, I don't know. Bill
