On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 15:26 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >I don't see why we should add cruft to our release tags to help people >shoot their own feet either. I'm not going to start flamewar over this - >there are worse things in life that RPMforge disttags :) but I simply >don't see no value added whatsoever by trying to create an upgrade path >for *extras* when one doesn't exist for the actual products. Here's the point: Its not mandatory. If you're not trying to work the "single spec/multiple Fedoras" case, then don't use it. The standard will make that very clear. ~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
