On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:48 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > Right now I'm thinking: > kernel modules must have kernel-version-release in the package name for > the kernel module - this makes for irritating package naming and cvs > naming but <shrug> I support this because I haven't seen a better solution. But IMO the CVS naming is a no go. There should be one dir per one module package in CVS, not one for each module package for a specific kernel, otherwise it's a major PITA to maintain. I imagine it isn't too hard to achieve that.
