Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #11 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-26 04:38:37 EDT --- >> Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, >> but I do not know how to fix them ... >> For now, only local users can authenticate. >> >> Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works? > Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original > code? I borrowed the idea from Gentoo and Ubuntu. They created this script so people do not need to have a local account on the server. By what I have read about Pam, it can use this scheme. # partimaged user database auth sufficient pam_userdb.so db=/etc/partimaged/passwd But I always get a "password mismatch". I added a README.Fedora.html (I chose html, because it has some useful links). I have updated the release: Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review