Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-26 14:37:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > >> Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, > >> but I do not know how to fix them ... > >> For now, only local users can authenticate. > >> > >> Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works? > > > Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original > > code? > > I borrowed the idea from Gentoo and Ubuntu. They created this script so people > do not need to have a local account on the server. By what I have read about > Pam, it can use this scheme. > > # partimaged user database > auth sufficient pam_userdb.so db=/etc/partimaged/passwd > > But I always get a "password mismatch". I'm not sure I like the security implications of this. This would mean that if you run partimage-server on your network, anyone on your network with a Fedora LiveCD with this installed can dump images on your server. > > I added a README.Fedora.html (I chose html, because it has some useful links). Good idea. But rename to partimage.README.html to avoid use of the word Fedora and SRPM clobbering. > I have updated the release: > > Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec > > SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-3.fc8.src.rpm Also, for partimaged-certs.cnf, you should mention in the README that this file should be customized. Not everyone is in Rio. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review