[Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260





--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-17 15:02:08 EDT ---
I'm not understanding how this package can possibly provide things like
"mingw32(kernel32.dll)" if it only contains directories, a text file and some
shell scripts.  The comment says:
  # These are actually provided by Windows itself, or Wine.
but since this package doesn't have any dependency on, say, Wine, I don't
understand how having the dependency in this package actually helps anything. 
Is there any documentation about this?  The guidelines only say  
  If a package contains binaries which depend on a DLL provided by another 
  package, these dependencies should be expressed in the form:
    mingw32(foo.dll)
but that doesn't actually talk about what should provide these symbols.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]