Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-17 15:02:08 EDT --- I'm not understanding how this package can possibly provide things like "mingw32(kernel32.dll)" if it only contains directories, a text file and some shell scripts. The comment says: # These are actually provided by Windows itself, or Wine. but since this package doesn't have any dependency on, say, Wine, I don't understand how having the dependency in this package actually helps anything. Is there any documentation about this? The guidelines only say If a package contains binaries which depend on a DLL provided by another package, these dependencies should be expressed in the form: mingw32(foo.dll) but that doesn't actually talk about what should provide these symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review