Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #5 from Sylvain Beucler <beuc@xxxxxxxx> 2008-09-03 05:14:21 EDT --- I think that people installing 'freedink' will expect to get the front-end. I think it would be best to have: - freedink (empty package) - Requires: freedink-engine, freedink-dfarc - freedink-engine - Requires: freedink-data - dfarc - Requires: <none> - freedink-data - Requires: <none> What do you think? > By the way, share/README and COPYING.DFArc-2.0 seem to be saying that > share/pixmaps/dfarc.png is licensed under COPYING.DFArc-2.0 and > it doesn't seem COPYING.DFArc-2.0 is enough free. How do you think? The license looks free enough to me. Were you confused by the stanza about the "Dink Media" (which references a completely different set of files, and which was incidentally released this month under the zlib license, cf. #459915)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review