Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-03 06:25:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think that people installing 'freedink' will expect to get the front-end. > > I think it would be best to have: > - freedink (empty package) - Requires: freedink-engine, freedink-dfarc > - freedink-engine - Requires: freedink-data > - dfarc - Requires: <none> > - freedink-data - Requires: <none> > > What do you think? If you are okay with this, I have no objections. > > By the way, share/README and COPYING.DFArc-2.0 seem to be saying that > > share/pixmaps/dfarc.png is licensed under COPYING.DFArc-2.0 and > > it doesn't seem COPYING.DFArc-2.0 is enough free. How do you think? > > The license looks free enough to me. Were you confused by the stanza about the > "Dink Media" (which references a completely different set of files, and which > was incidentally released this month under the zlib license, cf. #459915)? Because the license does not _define_ what "graphics" are under the influence of the license precisely. You may guess share/pixmaps/dfarc.png is not under this license, however as I said before as far as I read the source codes. - share/README seems to be saying that dfarc.png is under the license - COPYING.DFArc-2.0 says that all files from the old (?) 2.0 dfarc source are under this license - the license says that "graphics" files have non-free restriction - And from the license I cannot make it sure what files this file refers to as the "graphics". So for now I will guess that as dfarc.png is "graphics" file this file has non-free restriction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review