[Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916





--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-03 04:15:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Ah, interesting question.
> 
> This is intentional, but hopefully there's a cleaner way to do it.
> A user installing 'dfarc', the front-end, will want to install freedink as
> well. Similarly, somebody installing 'freedink' will want to install the
> front-end to play extensions or start the game in windowed mode (for example).

For me it seems that you are saying
- With freedink we can play some games, however some additional functions
  (like some extentions, modes in window mode) are not available
- With freedink-dfarc we can play freedink in some additional effects, however
  freedink-dfrac always requires freedink.

If I am correct, I recommend to remove "Requires: (freedink-)dfarc" from 
freedink srpm and keep "Requires: freedink" in freedink-dfarc srpm.

By the way, share/README and COPYING.DFArc-2.0 seem to be saying that
share/pixmaps/dfarc.png is licensed under COPYING.DFArc-2.0 and
it doesn't seem COPYING.DFArc-2.0 is enough free. How do you think?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]