Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ianweller@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From ianweller@xxxxxxxxx 2008-02-03 14:24 EST ------- i tried looking up the license and it only shows up on one page in google at http://www.thepromisedlan.org/flatnuke/sections/Download/Freedom/LICENSE-libraries-linux.txt under "xmlrpc-epi license". i'm not sure if this is can be packaged in fedora based on the license, and if it can, what do we call it? (the license also shows up at http://xmlrpc-epi.sourceforge.net/main.php?t=license ) i'm assuming the reason it was considered "BSD" before was because that is what it is considered on the sf.net project home page. i'm not sure where to make an upstream inquiry, their devel list on sf.net has turned into a spam list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review