Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2008-02-03 15:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > i tried looking up the license and it only shows up on one page in google at > http://www.thepromisedlan.org/flatnuke/sections/Download/Freedom/LICENSE-libraries-linux.txt > under "xmlrpc-epi license". i'm not sure if this is can be packaged in fedora > based on the license, and if it can, what do we call it? > The license listed here: http://xmlrpc-epi.sourceforge.net/main.php?t=license Is perfectly fine, what makes you unsure about this? Its just a variant of the MIT license, and as such we will call it MIT, more specific see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT And then do a word for word comparision between the xmlrpc-epi and the "Modern Style with sublicense" MIT variant. Notice how they are almost 100% the same? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review