https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305963 Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #4) > > [!]: Latest version is packaged. > > > > What is the plan for this upstream being archived? Are you planning on just > > carrying any needed downstream packages? > > This is a problematic one indeed. I believe people will start to take > attention because this is a basic (cornerstone) component of a modern Python > stack for Ethereum/IPFS/Web3. Okay. It seems strange to import an archived upstream so if you plan on downstream patching any FTBFS/bugs downstream until a new community upstream emerges... this is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305963 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202305963%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue