https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303993 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #1) > [!?]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > > Jerry, do we want Obsoletes & Provides for this one? I don't think we do. The binary RPMs haven't changed names; they are still ocaml-opam-0install-cudf and ocaml-opam-0install-cudf-devel. We're just changing git repo names, really. The normal upgrade path should work for the new package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303993 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202303993%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
