https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you, Peter, for looking at the package. > Looks good to me except for a thing that the upstream released version 1.0.0 recently while you still have 0.34 packaged. > I guess this has something with API/ABI. Right in Fedora we are tracking Stackage.org LTS which is still on this previous version. 1.0+ will likely go into Fedora 42 (via a newer Stackage major release) - I think it contains breaking API changes. > Also another thins is a noisy rpmlnt (see below). Please comment what's going on? Right unfortunately the rpmlint errors are a known issue, which I have reported to ghc upstream: basically the GHC toolchain is a bit different to the mainstream and it is non-trivial to fix this, also there is no real impact - things actually work fine: so we have been waiving these for a while. The undefined-non-weak-symbol error is mentioned in the Haskell Packaging Guidelines <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Haskell/#_shared_and_static_library_linking>. I should get unused-direct-shlib-dependency added too, though it sounds less serious maybe. The upstream issue tracker is <https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/17157>. It is annoying though since these keep coming up in these reviews: perhaps rpmlint could be made to ignore them for Haskell for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202266044%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
