[Bug 2266044] Review Request: ghc-crypton - Cryptography Primitives sink

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044



--- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Looks good to me except for a thing that the upstream released version 1.0.0
recently while you still have 0.34 packaged. I guess this has something with
API/ABI.


Also another thins is a noisy rpmlnt (see below). Please comment what's going
on?


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Quite
complex formulae).
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ x: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: I did not test if the package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is NOT packaged (1.0.0).
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources aren't verified with gpgverify because upstream does not provie
signatures.
[?]: I did not test if the package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all
supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Untested if the packages tries to preserve timestamps of original
installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-crypton-0.34-2.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-crypton-devel-0.34-2.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-crypton-prof-0.34-2.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-crypton-0.34-2.fc41.src.rpm
===========================================================================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
==========================================================================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpfnt50g3t')]
checks: 32, packages: 4

ghc-crypton-devel.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/crypton-0.34/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH.a
ghc-crypton-prof.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/crypton-0.34/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH_p.a
ghc-crypton.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-crypton-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
=====================================================================================================
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings, 23 filtered, 2
badness; has taken 5.1 s
=====================================================================================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 3

ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/lib64/libm.so.6
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHStemplate-haskell-2.19.0.0-ghc9.4.5.so
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSpretty-1.1.3.6-ghc9.4.5.so
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSghc-boot-th-9.4.5-ghc9.4.5.so
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSdeepseq-1.4.8.0-ghc9.4.5.so
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
/lib64/libgmp.so.10
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
stg_thawArrayzh 
(/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSghc-prim-0.9.0-ghc9.4.5.so)
...
<skipped more than 100 of lines>
...
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
suspendThread   
(/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so)
ghc-crypton.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so
resumeThread    
(/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so)
ghc-crypton-devel.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/crypton-0.34/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH.a
ghc-crypton-prof.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/crypton-0.34/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH_p.a
ghc-crypton.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-crypton-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 725 errors, 2 warnings, 18 filtered, 725
badness; has taken 5.1 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
ghc-crypton:
/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/crypton-0.34/crypton-0.34.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
4444846924ca55615fce104913a5a68675a180cfeadc350ab2b124fba1bc1ed6
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
4444846924ca55615fce104913a5a68675a180cfeadc350ab2b124fba1bc1ed6


Requires
--------
ghc-crypton (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSbase-4.17.1.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSbasement-0.0.16-J8UFRjmsTYU7wBgfpjdWQn-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSbytestring-0.11.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSdeepseq-1.4.8.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-bignum-1.3-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-boot-th-9.4.5-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-prim-0.9.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSinteger-gmp-1.1-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSmemory-0.18.0-BlEEr4I2pf1C6AnGmCyaxp-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSpretty-1.1.3.6-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libHStemplate-haskell-2.19.0.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgmp.so.10()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

ghc-crypton-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ghc-compiler
    ghc-crypton(x86-64)
    ghc-devel(base-4.17.1.0)
    ghc-devel(basement-0.0.16-J8UFRjmsTYU7wBgfpjdWQn)
    ghc-devel(bytestring-0.11.4.0)
    ghc-devel(deepseq-1.4.8.0)
    ghc-devel(ghc-prim-0.9.0)
    ghc-devel(integer-gmp-1.1)
    ghc-devel(memory-0.18.0-BlEEr4I2pf1C6AnGmCyaxp)

ghc-crypton-prof (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ghc-crypton-devel(x86-64)
    ghc-prof(base-4.17.1.0)
    ghc-prof(basement-0.0.16-J8UFRjmsTYU7wBgfpjdWQn)
    ghc-prof(bytestring-0.11.4.0)
    ghc-prof(deepseq-1.4.8.0)
    ghc-prof(ghc-prim-0.9.0)
    ghc-prof(integer-gmp-1.1)
    ghc-prof(memory-0.18.0-BlEEr4I2pf1C6AnGmCyaxp)



Provides
--------
ghc-crypton:
    ghc-crypton
    ghc-crypton(x86-64)
    libHScrypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit)

ghc-crypton-devel:
    ghc-crypton-devel
    ghc-crypton-devel(x86-64)
    ghc-crypton-static
    ghc-crypton-static(x86-64)
    ghc-devel(crypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH)

ghc-crypton-prof:
    ghc-crypton-prof
    ghc-crypton-prof(x86-64)
    ghc-prof(crypton-0.34-6W2MMGB8Jxx5wMC0V3cufH)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2266044
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Haskell, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: PHP, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Java, Python, R, Perl, fonts
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202266044%23c10

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux