[Bug 2297995] Review Request: rust-libpanel - Rust bindings for GNOME libpanel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297995

Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Steffan from comment #4)
> (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #3)
> > * [Not a blocker] The file with licensing terms need some love. I don't
> > think that "Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>" is a valid licensing
> > term. However I see this as upstream issue not ours. In the mean time ask
> > upstream to fill placeholders with a real values.
> 
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Rust/libpanel-rs/-/issues/7 for getting
> upstream to fixup the license.
> 
> > * The more worrying issue is that the resulting RPM package couldn't be
> > installed properly in chroot (while running fedora-review) on my machine.
> > Maybe there is something wrong with my system or the package intended for
> > fedora-41? Could you please investigate it?
> 
> Confirmed that something is going on. I'll get it fixed.
> 
> > * Looks like you accidentally packaged two copies of licensing. Since the
> > package heavily uses macros maybe adding it manually isn't necessary
> > anymore. Take a look at this one. The same story with README.md.
> 
> This is common and known for the rust2rpm generated packages. I've not had
> to do anything about it for the other packages.
> 
> > * Version 0.5.0 is out. Does anything stop you from packaging it?
> 
> The latest version requires the entire gtk stack to be upgraded. This will
> be done in Rawhide at a later time. I think we want to try to sort out GIR
> syncing stuff before the upgrade of all of the packages. This will be
> handled at the Rust SIG level so I'm focused on packaging the compatible
> versions.

Ok, got it. I don't have anything else to discuss so this package is

================
=== APPROVED ===
================


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297995

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202297995%23c5

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux