[Bug 2295820] Review Request: hipblaslt - ROCm general matrix operations beyond BLAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820



--- Comment #24 from Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Tom Rix from comment #23)
> (In reply to Tim Flink from comment #19)
> > Created attachment 2041182 [details]
> > specfile changes for discussion
> > 
> > I've attached an initial patch for the hipblaslt specfile that contains a
> > few things, three are pretty minor:
> > 
> > 1. I changed a few of the BuildRequires to use pkgconfig where appropriate
> Can you explain (likely again) why pkgconfig ?  I would prefer to keep the
> BuildRequires as-is unless there is a MUST item somewhere you can point to.

It's a SHOULD according to the packaging guidelines. I understand why its a
thing but I don't personally have any strong feelings about it.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PkgConfigBuildRequires/

> > 2. I added a different way to disable the rpath check disable when building
> > --with test that works with mock. I'd like to have this in all of the rocm
> > packages that have -test subpackages to make building them easier but this
> > can wait for a more general discussion, it doesn't have to be added now if
> > there are objections.
> 
> Having a mockable set of -test subpackages is generally good, then we can
> talk about getting them into the distro.  Did you want to do this for the
> set ?

Beyond getting the -test packages into the distro, it makes them easier to
build in copr and makes them easier to build for me personally since I almost
always use mock for local package builds.

Like I said, I don't care a ton if it's done right now. It's something that I'm
definitely going to be proposing for all the ROCm packages once I'm able to to
spend more time testing them - the builtin packages seem to be the best place
to start.

> > 3. I added some missing deps from the -test subpackage
> > 
> 
> I'll add these if there is another revision, but these would fall out of #2
> if you wanted to do #2.

I don't understand what those deps have to do with making -test buildable in
mock. The current package doesn't build --with test even if  %global
__brp_check_rpaths %{nil} is used instead of QA_RPATHS=0xff. The build deps I
added fix that build problem.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c24

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux