https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820 --- Comment #25 from Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This feels like a dumb question but I'll ask it anyways - do we care if hipblaslt is usable when installed on its own? I assume that we do but at the same time, it sounds like the only know use case for it right now is using new pytorch on datacenter cards. I know that this package at least needs hipblas and I think it needs python3-tensile but neither of those are installed if you install hipblaslt (or hipblaslt-test) on its own. On a related note, environment-modules (needed for 'module load rocm/gfx11') isn't installed either but I think that's an issue with more rocm packages than just hipblaslt. That's on my todo list but I haven't seen complaints about it so it's not terribly high on the priority list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c25 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
