https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249418 --- Comment #21 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- >>> b) Please remove patch to update FSF address, should not change license >>> files distributed with the software, >>> just let upstream know about it, if the accept your pull request, can >>> include changes in the next version. >> I can’t find anything in the Packaging Guidelines indicating that updating the FSF address in copies of the GPL is out of bounds. >> After all, this change doesn’t modify the licensing conditions and helps users who want to get a copy of the license from the FSF. > Will need to look up where this is. The only requirement is to report that the address is outdated. Modifying the > license from what upstream provides is not good practice. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249418 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202249418%23c21 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
