[Bug 2017179] Review Request: replxx - Readline and libedit replacement library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017179

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx |
                   |)                           |
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> The author of replxx appears to be no longer responsive, is it possible to apply the patch at https://github.com/AmokHuginnsson/replxx/pull/142 as part of the package build to solve the license issue?
I think so. Upstream made a mistake in the licensing annotation, but we have
clarified that actual license is more permissive, so we can use the file.

No big comments, but some suggestions:

> Release:        3%{?dist}
'Release: %autorelease' and '%autochangelog' instead of an explicit changelog,
see
https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/opting-in.html

> BuildRequires:  cmake, gcc, gcc-c++
Please use separate lines for each of the items.

> %setup -q
> %patch0 -p1
%autosetup -p1

> %cmake .
Drop the '.'. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CMake/
don't use it.

> ctest -V %{?_smp_mflags}
Just '%ctest', see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CMake/.

> %{_libdir}/*.so
%{_libdir}/libreplxx*.so

The directory %{_datadir}/cmake/%{name} should be owned by the package.
So change
> %{_datadir}/cmake/%{name}/*.cmake
to '%{_datadir}/cmake/%{name}'.

> %doc
Change that to '%doc README.md'.

Hmm, when I download the specified Source0 file, the top directory is called
'replxx-release-0.0.4/'.
So it sounds like you need '%autosetup -p1 -n replxx-release-%{version}'

%description should be wrapped to <= 80 columns (right now it's ~65).

This is pretty close, but let's do another round because of the various small
nitpicks.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017179

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202017179%23c15
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux