[Bug 2182151] Review Request: ktls-utils - TLS Handshake agent for kernel sockets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151

Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx
                   |                            |)



--- Comment #45 from Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #44)
> Source0 URL is Ok.
> Source archive (SHA-512:
> cee06b1f50574fb338be29dd39befe460fc7d80c3b1097954fc172bb3c28e855428845f16f161
> 506763d81ae397e977e897d81c42f059870c2d858b9623c77e3) is original. Ok.
> 
> New licenses found:
> aclocal.m4: FSFULLRWD AND GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-generic
> AND FSFULLR
> compile: GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-generic
> configure: FSFULLR
> install-sh: X11
> Makefile.in, src/Makefile.in, src/tlshd/Makefile.in, systemd/Makefile.in:
> FSFULLRWD AND GPL-2.0-only
> missing: GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-generic
> 
> Changed licenses:
> README, README.md: GPL-1.0-or-later → GPL-2.0-only
> 
> Removed licenses:
> THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES: LGPL-2.1 text
> 
> FIX: Remove "AND GPL-1.0-or-later" from a License tag because README.md
> changed the license.
> 
> TODO: Remove "%autopatch -p1". from %prep section. There are no patches.
Unless this is perfect code... There will be patches... :-) 

> 
> $ rpmlint ktls-utils.spec ../SRPMS/ktls-utils-0.9-1.fc39.src.rpm
> rpmlint is Ok.
> 
> 
> FIX: The package fails to build on i686 in F39
> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101969239) with the
> same error. Either fix it, or exclude building from 32-bit x86 architectures.
This is a process error!!!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
93, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Has nothing to do with the actual package!!! There is no python in
the package so how can python cause a build to fail??? 

> 
> Please correct the FIX items, consider fixing TODO items, and provide an
> updates spec file.
Please reconsider approving this package... It should not
be this difficult to get a truly need package approved... IMHO


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202182151%23c45
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux