https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211959 Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-qt6-qtlocation.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-qt6-qtlocation-6.5.1-3.fc39.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jun 16 2023 Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> - 6.5.1-3 - Fix license - Fix %%{mingwXX_libdir}/qt6/plugins/geoservices/ dir ownership -- I don't really understand why [1] lists all those licenses, there are no references to them anywhere in the source code. Looking also at the native packages, the license for Qt packages appears to be LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0 I've adopted this license, and will also adopt it for the other mingw-qt6-* packages. -- The dir ownership was indeed an oversight and fixed. -- All other notices are false positives resp warnings which do not apply to mingw packages. [1] https://github.com/qt/qtlocation/tree/v6.5.1/LICENSES -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211959 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202211959%23c5 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
