https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 Tom Stellard <tstellar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(tstellar@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #12 from Tom Stellard <tstellar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #11) > > Which blender are you using, can you send me instructions ? > > I just used Fedora's Blender package. Go to edit->preferences to open the > preferences window, then click on "System" on the left then "HIP" on the top. > If you install rocm-hip, check on a system with supported HW, it will be > found in the list. If you then delete the libamdhip64.so symlink, it won't > find hip anymore. > I'll fix the package for now and we can fix blender later. > > > Using fedora's with -DWITH_CYCLES_HIP_BINARIES=ON fails in to build in a non hip area. > > I'm not sure about this, I just used the existing fedora package. I guess > maybe you can build blender against hip-devel or rocm-hip-devel to get it to > link at compile time? > > > Note: Incorrect Requires : /usr/lib64/amdgcn/bitcode > > I can use just "Requires: rocm-device-libs" if that works for you, but > rpmlint complains about explicit-lib-dependency. I guess I can just ignore > it. > > > could bitcode/ be installed into clang's resource dir ? > > Sure I can do that, but it's unrelated to the dependency. Basically the > default is to install to /usr/amdgcn/bitcode, so I patched it to put it in > /usr/lib64/amdgcn/bitcode (arbitrary decision). Putting it in > /usr/lib64/clang/VERSION/amdgcn/bitcode or similiar is fine by me, but I'll > need to land multiple patches in the existing packages to stage it over to > the new location. > Is this blocking for this review? Or can I do it later? I'll start the work > on moving it now if you think it's valuable; I just don't understand the > logic on the clang side and would need to dive into that code a bit to find > the best location for the bitcodes. Where does clang search for this by default? I think it would make sense to put the bit code in that directory. I know this code in clang fairly well and I can help debug it if you give me a simple example. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
