https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121870 --- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > a) Should .h and .so files be in a devel package? I don't think so, as this isn't a library meant to be linked against, the .so is the actual program and is injected via LD_PRELOAD / ld.so path to perform the proxying > b) Is there an alternative package that is actively maintained? This code is quite old though it seems well written and quite portable. I haven't seen one, but I'd be open to alternatives. I'm mostly packaging this because we still use it at work > c) Configure script is available under Free Software License and is distributed with the source tarball, but is not packaged. Do you mean the autotools script? those are only needed during build, not on the target system -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121870 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
