https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643 Jan Drögehoff <sentrycraft123@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sentrycraft123@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #12 from Jan Drögehoff <sentrycraft123@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #4) > > ISC License > > ----------- > > lite-xl-2.1.0/src/api/utf8.c > > > > MIT License SIL Open Font License 1.1 > > ------------------------------------- > > lite-xl-2.1.0/licenses/licenses.md > > > The fedora-review tool finds also these two licenses. Should we > include them in the License field? the code that is suppose to be ISC licensed is actually MIT and had been wrongly put in place. upstream corrected the license and licensecheck now properly reports it as MIT. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
