[Bug 2028900] Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-cli - CLI tool for developing, testing, and using Tree-sitter parsers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900



--- Comment #12 from Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL:
https://alebastr.fedorapeople.org/review/tree-sitter-cli/rust-tree-sitter-cli.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alebastr.fedorapeople.org/review/tree-sitter-cli/rust-tree-sitter-cli-0.20.6-1.fc36.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/3938868

The patch was already sent to upstream in the bindgen PR, but I just made
another PR for all accumulated architecture support fixes[1] and an issue[2]
for the only remaining failure.

> I also wonder if you could replace this:
> With setting INCLUDEDIR or something like that to the path of the tree-sitter sources that are bundled with rust-tree-sitter anyway.

Yup, good idea. Nothing there needs the shared library from libtree-sitter
anyways and it's better to match the headers used for tests with the bundled
library source.
Replaced with an extremely evil symlink to %{cargo_registry}/tree-sitter-...
and left an explanation with source code link. It really has to be done that
way :(

I'm open to ideas on replacing a lovely reference to '../lib'[3] with a path to
another crate's source. I had no luck searching for a code snippet or library
:)

> This file seems to be missing from the SRPM.

I don't think it's worth adding the file to the SRPM as it doesn't participate
in the build and I just added a licensing summary. I'm going to keep the file
in dist-git though. Does that sound fine?

> Please exclude the npm / NodeJS files (npm/, emscripten-version) from getting installed with the -devel package, and investigate whether you need the "vendor/xterm-colors.json" file.

emscripten-version[4] and vendors/xterm-colors.json[5] both are necessary for
building the crate. npm/ is unused though, so I'm removing it now.

Other changes:
 - updated to 0.20.6 as we're no longer care about the libtree-sitter version
(well, mostly...)
 - added %ifarch conditionals for a test that requires nodejs

[1]: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/pull/1692
[2]: https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/issues/1693
[3]:
https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/blob/ccd6bf554d922596ce905730d98a77af368bba5c/cli/src/tests/helpers/dirs.rs#L4
[4]:
https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/blob/ccd6bf554d922596ce905730d98a77af368bba5c/cli/build.rs#L19
[5]:
https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/blob/ccd6bf554d922596ce905730d98a77af368bba5c/cli/src/highlight.rs#L44


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux