https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044664 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks Felix! Using rocm-device-libs is fine by me, see update below. Regarding rocm-cmake, as far as I know, it's only needed for some hip-related math libraries. I've built the stack all the way up to OpenCL and ran HW tests without issues. Furthermore Upstream seems fine with this as well. I've been working with the Debian guys to coordinate these packages, so I'm a bit surprised that they use it, but I'll contact them and see if there's anything I missed (or they missed). As well, upstream is looking to merge this into llvm proper I think, similar to libclc. I think for now it makes sense to copy libclc, until upstream makes a change. The issue is that upstream is targeting unstable LLVM, so they would first need to change their development to use stable llvm before they can reliably upstream these changes, I think. Finally, I need to update these two packages to 5.0.0, which was released a few days ago, but the compiler support needs patches to compile against stable llvm. We can review these as-is though and update them later. Spec URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocm-device-libs.spec SRPM URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocm-device-libs-4.5.2-1.fc36.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044664 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
