https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Why is this package called libfungw, when upstream repository and page refers to it only as fungw? Does that conflict with existing fedora package? I think fungw is better name for the package. Why do you have %{name}-perl aliases and then use %package -n %{libperl} ?? %package perl without -n produces just %{name}-perl by default. It is simpler, cleaner and easier to read. Unless different prefix is required, use just suffixes for subpackages. There are multiple definitions not really required. Just use: %package perl Requires: %{name}... %description perl Blabla %files perl %{_bindir}/whatever It the application uses dlopen, I think it should have own subdirectory %{_libdir}/%{name}, where it would store its own shared code/libraries. %_libdir is reserved for libraries used by ld.so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
